Romantic Era Style & Art Nouveau

In the time period between 1780-1850, a new era emerged.   Romanticism was more of an idea, a perspective, or one could even say an attitude in art, music, philosophy, poetry, and architecture.  Many people had their own idea about the definition of Romanticism, and rarely did their ideas match up with the next persons.  But even with so many having their opinions and thoughts on Romanticism, there was always a common theme within the definition-Expression.  The Romantic Era emerged from chaos and conversion.  The French Revolution being in its initial phase and the Industrial Revolution moving full steam ahead, it was a time of conflict and confidence.  Artists and people felt that they could conquer the world and create art how they wanted to, and conflict with more classically trained artists and philosophers not wanting to even recognize those Romantics as artists.  The result of this was having an eclectic grouping of art coming out of this period.

Art I Adore:

bor

This painting is called Aurora Borealis.  It was painted by Romantic artist Frederic Edwin Church. This artwork was created from two sketches.  One from Church himself, and one from a pupil of his.  This first piece is categorized as a Romantic composition. It was painted in 1865 and is a landscape composition painted on an oil canvas located in the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C.  Some say that this painting also suggested that because the Aurora is mostly only seen in the North, that it was evidence of God’s dissatisfaction of the way the South for supporting slavery.  It was said that it “alluded to this divine omen relating to the unresolved conflict” (Smithsonian American Art Museum: Commemorative Guide. Nashville, TN: Beckon Books, 2015).   During the Romantic Era, you see the bits and pieces of religion come back into play that may have been pushed to the side during the more classical compositions of the Classical Era. There are many great examples of luminism in this piece.  You can see the foggy, hazy air, without any direct lines, diffused light, and fabulous, natural tranquility throughout the picture.  Church was also a member of the Hudson River School, which this picture demonstrates what style of landscape paintings they were known for.  I was excited to see this piece as I, like most of us here in Alaska, look up at night, and when lady Aurora blesses us with her presence, it’s like the first time we’ve ever seen them every time. This painting was done well before advance photography was discovered.  The Aurora Borealis composition allowed for common people to see some spectacularly uncommon phenomena that they would have never before been able to see.

turner2

This is another composition created by English Romantic artist, JMW Turner.  It is called Fisherman at Sea and was painted in 1794.  This painting was also oil painted on canvas.  In this painting, we see a small boat in a powerful ocean.  This marine composition represents the intensity of nature, with the dark sky, created with soft brush strokes, and a very large contrast in light and dark and the simplicity of man, represented by a small, battered boat, toughing it out in the rough seas, with dangerous terrain surrounding them.  The moon is creeping through the clouds and is just as present as the light from the fisherman’s lantern.  Both playing an eager role in their representation of nature vs. man.   The ocean is so very large compared to the human aspect in this picture, it very much gives me a feeling of nature being valued over civilization when I look at the picture.  This picture creates a lot of emotion, anxiety the most prevalent.  Bringing an emotional aspect to paintings during this time was very common.  There is a lot of luminism used in this piece as well.  Again, you can see the diffused light and hazy brush strokes.  There is a peacefulness created amongst the chaos of nature in this picture.  The emotion it creates is the part I enjoy the most in this painting.  I find it interesting that this picture portrays more of a destructiveness and darkness, whereas from Neoclassical Era to the beginning of art, compositions were always representative of morality and the church, and a “bigger picture”.  Now get to see another side of art with more emphasis on nature, emotions, and the individual.

Art I Just Can’t Wrap My Head Around:

invaluable-art-nouveau-5b-Egon-Schiele-670x479

Reclining Woman With Green Stockings” -This is an example of Art Nouveau.  It is by Austrian artist Egon Schiele.  It was painted in 1917 and was also an oil painting on canvas.   I don’t like the way color or line is used in this piece. I think it is chaotic, and not in a good way.  The hard jawline and muscular appendages,  and muddy muted coloring is a huge turn off for me.  From what I’ve read, this piece was intended to be a sexy, provocative composition, it just feels wrong to look at.  Because it is not even sexy or beautiful.   It’s more like a train-wreck, that I don’t even want to look at.  It just doesn’t look like the more traditional art or even good art.  I can very much tell why that Art Nouveau was a short-lived style.  Schiele was transitioning from earlier works with straight lines, to more accurate, curvy lines that made his subjects look more like they do in this piece.  He is not only known for his use of twisted bodies and expressive lines in his work, but for bringing forth a new presentation of sexuality.  In fact,  Jane Kaller has commented on Schiele’s work as “being grotesque, erotic, pornographic, or disturbing, focusing on sex, death, and discovery.” (Harry Abrams).  And it makes total sense.  This movement was to move away from artists being told how to do their art.  They took this as an opportunity to express themselves exactly how they’d like without fear of consequences for doing so.

Riga_Jugendstil-Ornament_Art_Nouveau

Riga, Europe, is home a sizable exhibit of Art Nouveau architecture.  Many pieces just like this one adorn the streets of Riga.  I don’t like them.  They are odd to me.  The art doesn’t make sense to me.  I can appreciate the detail artists put into this genre of work during this time period.  The form of Art Nouveau encompasses all forms of arts from oil canvas paintings, poetry, architecture and even interior design.  You can see the distinguished curved lines and exotic motifs throughout the streets of Riga.  In this piece, you see a woman (a very common theme in this form of art) and long hair.  I think that this is a good example of the “art gone rogue” attitude that emerged with the industrial revolution.  The streets of Riga demonstrate the fusion of structure and adornment of the architecture.

Works Cited

“The Influence of Art History on Modern Design: Art Nouveau.” PIXEL77, pixel77.com/art-history-modern-design-art-nouveau/.

“Posters Archives.” Invaluable, www.invaluable.com/blog/tag/posters/.

McKay, Kate. “The Basic of Romantic Art.” The Art of Manliness, 27 May 2018, www.artofmanliness.com/articles/the-basics-of-art-the-romantic-period/.

Church, Frederic Edwin. “Aurora Borealis, 1865 – Frederic Edwin Church.” Www.wikiart.org, 1 Jan. 1865, www.wikiart.org/en/frederic-edwin-church/aurora-borealis-1865.

Church, Frederic Edwin. “Aurora Borealis, 1865 – Frederic Edwin Church.” Www.wikiart.org, 1 Jan. 1865, www.wikiart.org/en/frederic-edwin-church/aurora-borealis-1865

“Fishermen at Sea.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 27 May 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishermen_at_Sea.

Reclining Woman with Green Stockings, 1917 by Egon Schiele, www.egon-schiele.com/reclining-woman-with-green-stockings.jsp.

“Riga.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 23 Oct. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riga.

5 thoughts on “Romantic Era Style & Art Nouveau”

  1. Hi Pam! You have chosen some great pieces here. My favorite of your style choices is the Romantic era. Aurora Borealis by Frederic Edwin Church is so beautiful! It glows! I have had the pleasure to see the Northern Lights as well, and this is a gorgeous reminder. I would love to own this piece. I agree that you see religion poke it’s head up in Romantic works, and I adore that you added the piece about how God only showed the lights to northerners as a sign of His dislike of the south’s position on slavery. Both of your Romantic style choices have a use of light that make them seem to glow, and I am drawn to that. Art Nouveau does much less for my tastes, but I appreciate the lines. There is always accentuating curves in this style of art that I appreciate. It seems very feminine to me. I agree, as well, with your “art gone rogue” impression. Great post!

    Like

  2. Pam, I agree with you about your likes and dislikes of your choices of art. The first two are both something that I would like more than the second two, although, I don’t find the second painting as appealing as the first because of the anxiety and gloomy emotion shown in it like you stated. Focusing on the third painting by Schiele, I can understand when you said how it was chaotic but not in a good way, the painting seems very awkward and masculine. The arts of elements you shared really helped me understand the paintings and architecture even more. My favorite style of art would have to be the Romantic style and specifically the Hudson River School paintings! Very nice post!

    Like

  3. Great post! I like what you said on how Romanticism emerged from the chaos that was surrounding the world during that era. I feel that Romanticism was a rejection of all the bad that was going on and instead was used to go against it by utilizing beauty in the form of art. This was done, in my opinion, through the use of color and light, as well as hazy brushwork to give the paintings more of a fantasy-world type of look. Notice in the paintings you presented that the sort of dreamy aspect, or fantasy-like feel, found in these paintings stem of the use of light. For instance, light is used in the aurorba by reflection and in the other painting to bring light into the sea. In my opinion, that is what makes these painting really good. Of course, there are other things that help bring in the beauty of these two paintings from the Romanticism era, but that is just why I like it. Thank you for sharing!

    Like

  4. Oh the aurora borealis I miss them so much! I’ve always wondered what they looked like in the times that your first choice in painting was made. Whether they were a lot like they are now or so much better because there was practically no light pollution. The “firsherman at sea” painting I have to agree how it is painted does make it look like the ocean is taking over and seems more important that the fisherman. Gave me a man vs nature impression too. But, I’ll have to disagree with your position on art nouveau, it’s my favorite part of the romantic era after photography! I love your choices but I love everything about art nouveau pieces. I love how art nouveau is the “rouge” art because you see a different side of artists. Most art until this point has always been portraits, Greek or Roman related, church related and now with other romantic styles you have nature. Art nouveau gives you a different view of some of the same things and that’s why I love it.

    Like

  5. I Really enjoyed reading your post, you had a lot of great information as well as personal opinions much like mine. Starting off I noticed you had the “Aurora Borealis” Painting like my blog, as soon as I saw it I wanted to include it. The colors and subject matter alone are amazing. You have to wonder what Frederic Edwin Church thought they were viewing back then, the sight must have been as beautiful as it is terrifying, like you stated a sign of an omen of some kind. It really is quite unique that we get to experience them. I also liked your “Fisherman at Sea” painting, It shows the power of mother nature and how man must try and conquer it. It also contained a good viewing angle in my opinion, its almost as if you are partially looking under the water. The sun gleaming through the darkness also adds a nice touch of aesthetic that I find appealing, a mix of dark and light, good and bad, it very much relates to life itself just as mother nature will not always have sunny days. As far as the last two pictures I’m very much in agreement with you, I mean really what were they thinking. The “Reclining Woman With Green Stockings” was just terrible and didn’t at all convey the intended message. As for the statues/sculptures, Although I appreciate the craftsmanship and detail, they just come off as scary and a bit creepy. Nice Job!

    Like

Leave a comment